In my last post, I talked about how Oxford University is an interesting mixture of very old traditions and a cutting-edge research environment, and how the university strives to bring these two ideas together in a way that isn’t exclusionary and inward-looking. Term has not yet started up here, so it is still somewhat rather quiet, and truth-be-told, I was having something of a difficult time trying to answer this question. However, today I received a great deal of correspondence from tutors and the university in several different forms, and this has helped me to answer the question!
Oxford still seems to be a place where oral communication is considered appropriate for arranging meetings, which is really quite odd from my perspective, where e-mail is preferred. Even when I am at home with my family, I still e-mail them things depending on whether or not they are out of the house, or if I simply want to remind them of something that is coming-up (it’s better that way, I think, because I tend to forget about meetings, so if I don’t remind someone when it’s on my mind, there is a chance the meeting or event or whatever will never happen). Today, I got a call from my tutorial partner for next term, who proceeded to set up a meeting with me for Monday to discuss a few things related to the tutorial. This wouldn’t be so strange, of course, except for the fact that the tutor had told him (in person) to call me and set this up when she had access to e-mail herself! The first time something like this happened, I felt a bit odd about the whole transaction, as it seemed terribly inefficient or, at least, had the potential to be that way. However, as last term wore on, I found that many tutors will do things like this, and it seems to work fine. What it suggests to me is that there is a way to not rely on various pieces of technology, and the whole transaction does seem a bit more personal, especially since such transactions are very seldom simply someone calling and saying “Meet you at half-six,” but often include a full conversation. Not only do I feel closer to tutorial partners because of this, but I think it reflects a more laid-back approach to work; just so long as what needs to get done gets done, there is nothing wrong with taking your time and enjoying the company of the people you work with.
In keeping with the eschewal of e-mail, I’ve also found that the university does not have anything at all like what Allegheny has in terms of a Chompergram. I never realized how much I’d miss that until I got here; I always found it sort of silly. In first term, I often missed things I really would have rather liked to attend simply because I had no idea that the things were going on. A lot of information relating to lectures and events are posted on scattered bulletin boards, which was something I did not realize. I’ve found that Oxford doesn’t look after you in this regard: if you are interested in a topic or some type of event, it is your job to find out what is offered and get there on your own. I think this reflects a great deal of confidence in students and their abilities to find things out on their own.
I still like the Chompergram, though.