Plagiarism
by Ann Bomberger,
Allegheny College Director of Expository Writing
This page is a resource
for students who are unsure what plagiarism is. It defines
plagiarism and gives examples that
demonstrate how to quote and paraphrase.
The
Allegheny Honor Code
Article III, points
3 and 4 explain Allegheny's official definition of plagiarism,
the most common form of academic dishonesty in writing courses.
Other sections of the Honor Code also apply to paper writing.
For a complete version of the Honor Code you can either look at
the copy
of it on the web or in A Catalogue for Allegheny College.
Article
III, points 3 and 4 state:
"3. Plagiarism is defined as using the ideas or words
of another without citing the sources from which the ideas or
words are taken. In take-home examinations, papers and reports,
the following must be carefully observed:
Examples
This section will
walk you through various examples of correct and incorrect paraphrases.
Note: Although
all of the examples below will describe when sources need quotation
marks and/or citations, remember that they follow a particular
form of citation, that of the Modern Language Association. Your
professor may require you to use some other form of citation (such
as the APA or Chicago style). Be sure to ask your professor if
you do not know the form of citation he/she requires (Diana Hacker's
A Writer's Reference, available in the bookstore, provides
citation protocols for The MLA style, the APA style, and the Chicago
Style).
Original
Source
All of the examples
quote or paraphrase this passage from Cynthia M. Duncan's essay
"Persistent Poverty in Appalachia: Scarce Work and Rigid
Stratification":
"limited opportunity
for steady work and income means that control over jobs is a
source of wealth and power. Jobs are a kind of currency. Private
employers give jobs to family members, friends, and, frequently,
political supporters" (111).
Duncan, Cynthia M.
"Persistent Poverty in Appalachia: Scarce Work and Rigid
Stratification." Rural Poverty. ed. Cynthia M. Duncan.
New York: Auburn House, 1992. 111-133.
How
do I know when something must be in quotation marks?
When you place sentences
in quotation marks you indicate that the author cited wrote the
exact words you have included.
Correct
use of quotation marks: According to Duncan, "limited
opportunity for steady work and income means that control over
jobs is a source of wealth and power" (111).
Incorrect
use of quotation marks: According to Duncan, "minimal
opportunity for long-term work and income means that control
over jobs is a source of wealth and power" (111). By changing
just a few words ("minimal" replaces "limited"
and "long-term" replaces "steady"), I incorrectly
told my audience what the author said. Even though the words
are synonyms, the citation improperly asserts that Duncan wrote
the exact words I cited.
If you think the
quotation needs to have something added to it to put it in the
proper context or if you want to remove something you don't think
is relevant to your paper, you may do so. To add something,
put it in brackets ([ ]); to take something out, insert
an ellipsis ( . . . ).
Correct
way to add words to a quotation: "limited opportunity
for steady work and income [in Appalachia] means that control
over jobs is a source of wealth and power" (Duncan 111).
By adding "in Appalachia," I in no way changed the
meaning of the sentence, I simply provided context that is supplied
elsewhere in Duncan's essay.
Incorrect
way to add words to a quotation: "limited opportunity
for steady work and income means that control over jobs is [not]
a source of wealth and power" (Duncan 111). The addition
of "not" completely altered the meaning of the sentence
and is therefore unfair to the original source.
Correct
use of an ellipsis: "Limited opportunity for
steady work and income means that control over jobs is a source
of wealth and power. . . . Private employers give jobs to family
members, friends, and, frequently, political supporters"
(Duncan 111). Removing "Jobs are a kind of currency"
did not fundamentally alter the meaning of the quotation and
therefore is acceptable.
Incorrect
use of an ellipsis: "Limited opportunity for
steady work and income means that control over jobs is a source
of wealth and power. Jobs are a kind of currency. Private employers
give jobs to . . . political supporters" (Duncan 111).
By taking out the phrase "family members, friends, and,
frequently," I made the sentence more narrow than the author
intended and therefore left out relevant information.
When
do I cite an author's idea?
If something is common
knowledge-- something that the vast majority of people in the
field you are studying would know-- then it does not need to be
cited. Figuring out what constitutes "common knowledge"
can be tricky. If you are unsure what kinds of information people
in your field of study know, then it is better to err on the side
of caution and cite the source.
Any time you use
someone else's idea, that source needs to be cited. You may either
include a direct quotation or you may paraphrase the idea and
cite it.
Example
of a correct paraphrase: Due to the scarce supply
of jobs in Appalachia, those people who decide who to hire have
tremendous power. Employers regularly fill their vacancies with
loved ones, friends, or political associates (Duncan 111). Neither
the sentence structure nor the words are derived
from the original quotation.
Original
quotation:"Limited opportunity for steady work
and income means that control over jobs is a source of wealth
and power. Jobs are a kind of currency. Private employers give
jobs to family members, friends, and, frequently, political
supporters" (Duncan 111).
Example of an incorrect paraphrase: Little opportunity
for a regular job and salary means that control over jobs is
a source of economic advantage and power (Duncan 111). Even
though few of the words in the paraphrase are found in the original
quotation, the paraphrase fails to use a different sentence
structure from the original source; it simply substitutes
synonyms. When writing a paraphrase, don't look at the original
quotation as you are writing. Instead, use your own words and
sentence structure to convey the idea. Then compare it with
the original to ensure that it does not accidentally use the
sentence structure or many of the words from the original source.
Example of an incorrect paraphrase: Control over
jobs is a source of power in a society where there is limited
opportunity for steady work. Employers dole out jobs to family
and friends, using jobs as a kind of currency (Duncan 111).
This sentence doesn't use the same sentence structure as the
original source, but it does use many of the exact phrases
from the source and does not put those phrases in quotation
marks. It's fine to use very common words the original source
cited (like "jobs" or "is"); however, using
an author's phrases without quotation marks turns into plagiarism.
Look closely at the incorrect paraphrase above: "control
over jobs," "power," "limited opportunity
for steady work," "kind of currency" all can
be found in the original quotation.
If you have other
questions about citation, either check with your professor or
send an email to ann.bomberger@allegheny.edu