"Why
God wants an earth, we have no idea
the entire creation is
an act of divine desire ("grace"); we don't know what
motivates it" (1).
***
|
Tara
Marie Fortier. Southern Arava Desert outside Kibbutz Ketura. February
2007.
|
|
Dominion
v. Stewardship: Jewish Directive for Environmental Action
Did God create the earth for the use of humankind? Or was humankind
created to care for the earth? Perhaps neither were created for
the sake of the other, but all were created for all. The quote of
Tivka Frymer-Kensky (above) gives the best answer: we do not know.
Does the term "dominion" give us unlimited rights to use
the earth according to our wants, or were we given a responsibility
of stewardship, to manage the Creation of God? The debate over dominion
versus stewardship has raged during the past few decades in which
the environment has become a hot-button issue and religion has been
identified as a culprit in our environmental mismanagement. I believe
that popular critiques of the influence of religion on the environment
are based on faulty analysis of the environmental ethic as it exists
within the Jewish tradition. I believe that Lynn White Jr. and other
critics based their attacks on the Judeo-Christian tradition on
a flawed reading of the opening of Genesis, analyzing the text from
a scientific viewpoint which did not take into account the inherent
difference in approaches necessary to study scientific and religious
texts. The sense of conflict between Judaism and the environment
is often supported by a reading of biblical texts and Jewish literature
from a viewpoint far removed from that of people of faith (2).
Below is a commentary on Lynn White Jr's major points and an exploration
of Jewish literature which provides evidence of a strong, Jewish
ethic for environmental action. Unfortunately, despite the evidence
of a strong directive for environmental ethic within Judaism, and
the roots of the Christian faith, this has not translated to contemporary
society. This gap between theory and practice is symptomatic of
the divide between the modern individual and nature, further discussed
in the section on contemporary context.
|
|
Lynn
White Jr. and Dominion
The Story of Noah
Bal Tashchit
Sustainability
Eleventh Commandment
Full Text
|
| Lynn
White Jr. and Dominion |
|
|
In
March 1967, Lynn White Jr. delivered his well-known speech, "The
Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis" during a meeting
of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. His
speech placed blame for the environmental crisis on the modern fusion
of science and technology and the use of that technology to exploit
nature. For both of these practices, Lynn White Jr. blamed the Judeo-Christian
tradition and the idea of human dominion over the earth.
Destructive
Applications of Technology:
One of the cornerstones of White's argument is that the 'Judeo-Christian
tradition' is responsible for the ecological change and potential
for destruction brought on by recent developments in science and
technology. He repeats the idea of "recent" developments by assuring
the reader that in the last century, "the impact of our race upon
the environment has so increased in force that it has changed in
essence…[and] no creature other than man has ever managed to foul
its nest in such short order" (3).
It is true that the monotheistic tradition has made a substantial
impact on science. Monotheism removed gods from natural objects,
and created in their study a means by which humankind can hope to
gain an understanding of the mind of God through the study of his
Creation (4). This idea was the
basis of appeal for many significant figures in scientific history,
including Newton and Galileo, who considered themselves more as
theologians than scientists (5).
Rather than proving that the monotheistic tradition was the catalyst
for the scientific horrors of our time, White himself points out
that "it was not until the late 18th century that the hypothesis
of God became unnecessary to many scientists" (6).
The removal of God from science predates the recent developments
of science and technology which White all too accurately identifies
to be the cause of our environmental ails. Thus, White exposes the
loophole in his own argument, perhaps it was not the early scientific
pursuit of knowledge, which often coincided with the pursuit of
God, but the more recent application of that science for materialistic
gains, without concern for God, which is the culprit for our environmental
ails.
|
|
Dominion:
(26)
Then God said, 'Let us make humankind in our image, according to
our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea,
and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all
the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that
creeps upon the earth.' (27) So God created
humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male
and female he created them. (28) God blessed
them, and God said to them, 'Be fruitful and multiply, and fill
the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the
sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that
moves upon the earth.'
|
(29)
God said, 'See, I have given you every plant yielding seed that
is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its
fruit; you shall have them for food. (30)
And to every beast of the earth, and to every bird of the air, and
to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the
breath of life, I have given every green plant for food.' And it
was so. (31) God saw everything that he had
made, and indeed, it was very good. And there was evening and there
was morning, the sixth day. (Gen 1:26-31).
|
|
There
has been much blame pointed at Genesis I for todays' environmental
ails, an argument which hinges on the inferred meaning of one word,
"dominion". Many critics of the Judeo-Christian tradition
argue that it is the cause for Western societies "man over
nature" mode of thinking. Others, particularly Talmudic commentators,
see it as nothing other than an assertion of "human primacy
in the natural order, in physical, intellectual, and spiritual terms"
(7), a standing reflected
in Adam's physical dominance, upright stature and unique ability
to recognize God. In the words of E. L. Allen, Adam "ris[es]
above nature because he is designed for a relation to God into which
[nature] cannot enter" (8).
No clear right of dominion over the environment is given
to humankind, merely an acknowledgment of the responsibility
of dominion, of maintaining the Creation, which is placed on humankind
due to their likeness to God and desire for his divine grace, received
through the fulfillment of his commandments.
Genesis Rabbah (8.12) explains God's proclamation as both
celebration and warning, based on the different meanings of the
Hebrew word used for dominion, which can be read as yirdu, "shall
rule" or as yer-du, "they will descend" or as yeradu,
"they will be ruled" depending on the pronunciation of
the vowels (9). This idea is elaborated
by Rashi, a medieval rabbi and author of the first comprehensive
commentaries on the Hebrew Bible, who studied the exact usage of
words in scripture. The various meanings of the yrdu signifies,
according to Rashi, that "if [man] is worthy, he dominates
over the beasts and cattle, if he is not worthy, he will sink lower
than them, and the beasts will rule over him" (10).
The recitation of blessings, for everything from wine and bread
to smelling spices and seeing a rainbow, is a reminder that "man
speaks not as the master of nature, but by the grace and goodness
of God, as its beneficiary" (11).
Back
to Top
|
| The
Story of Noah |
|
|
Outside
of the Garden:
"(17)...cursed
is the ground because of you;
in toil you shall eat of it all the days of your life;
(18) thorns and thistles it shall bring forth
for you;
and you shall eat the plants of the field.
(19) By the sweat of your face
you shall eat bread..." (Gen 3:17-19)
|
Covenant
with Noah and the Natural World:
(3)
Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you; and just as
I gave you the green plants, I give you everything. (4)
Only, you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its
blood. (5) For your own lifeblood I will
surely require a reckoning: from every animal I will require it
and from human beings, each one for the blood of another, I will
require a reckoning for human life. (6) Whoever
sheds the blood of a human, by a human shall that person’s blood
be shed; for in his own image God made humankind. (7)
And you, be fruitful and multiply, abound on the earth and multiply
in it.’ (8) Then God said to Noah and to
his sons with him, (9) ‘As for me, I am establishing
my covenant with you and your descendants after you, (10)
and with every living creature that is with you, the birds, the
domestic animals, and every animal of the earth with you, as many
as came out of the ark. (11) I establish
my covenant with you, that never again shall all flesh be cut off
by the waters of a flood, and never again shall there be a flood
to destroy the earth.’ (12) God said, ‘This
is the sign of the covenant that I make between me and you and every
living creature that is with you, for all future generations"
(Genesis 9: 3-12).
|
Blood
of Abel:
(11)
And now you are cursed from the ground, which has opened its mouth
to receive your brothers blood from your hand. (12)
When you till the ground, it will no longer yield to you its
strength; you will be a fugitive and a wanderer on the earth.
(Gen 4: 11-12). |
Flood:
(5)
The Lord saw that the wickedness of humankind was great in the earth,
and that every inclination of the thoughts of their hearts was only
evil continually. (6) And the Lord was sorry
that he had made humankind on the earth, and it grieved him to his
heart. (7) So the Lord said, I will blot
out from the earth the human beings I have createdpeople together
with animals and creeping things and birds of the air, for I am sorry
that I have made them. (Gen 6:5-7) |
|
The
story of Noah is an illustration of the intertwined fate of humankind
and nature. Starting in Chapter 3 of Genesis, the actions of humankind
diminished the natural fertility of the world. At first, the garden
required tending only, then the soil outside the garden needed to
be tilled, and when the blood of Abel cursed the ground it would
no longer yield. In the story of Noah, the flood comes as a response
to the curse of mankind upon creation. It is not the story of God
allowing one man and his family to be saved from the Flood, but
of God allowing one man and his family to be saved under the condition
that he first ensures the survival of every other living thing (12).
The convenant established between God and Noah after the flood is
not established for Noah and his family alone, but between God and
all living things.
In
the covenant the three laws set by God are meant to protect the
earth from receiving punishment for human faults. "In the first,
humans are told to be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth,
probably the only command of God that we've ever fully obeyed. Next,
they are told to refrain from eating blood because that is the life:
hierarchy does not imply total domination. The third regulation
emphasizes that no one can kill human beings, those responsible
for the earth, and demands the death penalty for that terrible crime…these
laws do not prevent violence. However, they do protect the earth
from being polluted by lawless behavior" (13).
These laws do not sever the link between humankind and nature, but
mute the wild fluctuations.
Back
to Top
|
| Bal
Tashchit |
The
most commonly quoted Jewish precept for environmental responsibility
is that of bal tashchit, given as instruction in Deuteronomy 20:19-20
for the ethical treatment of nature during times of war:
(19) If you besiege a town for a long time,
making war against it in order to take it, you must not destroy its
trees by wielding an axe against them. Although you may take food
from them, you must not cut them down. Are trees in the field human
beings that they should come under siege from you? (20)
You may destroy only the trees that you know do not produce food;
you may cut them down for use in building siege-works against the
town that makes war with you, until it falls. (Deut 20:19-20)
Lo
tashchit "you must not destroy" led to a biblical injunction
of bal taschit, or "you shall not needlessly destroy".
The law of bal tashchit is a reminder to respect all parts of creation.
There
is a tale of a farmer, who was clearing stones from his field and
tossing them onto the public road, "A pious man rebuked him, saying,
'Worthless one! Why are you clearing stones from land which is not
yours and depositing them on property which is yours?' The farmer
scoffed at him for this strange reversal of facts. In the course
of time the farmer had to sell his field, and as he was walking
on the public road, he fell on those same stones he had thoughtlessly
deposited there. He then understood the truth of the man's words:
the damage he had wrought in the public domain was ultimately damage
to his own property and well-being" (14).
This story is easily extrapolated into contemporary society, as
the world grapples with remorse and the urgent need to repair the
damage caused by our carelessness in recent decades.
Back
to Top
|
| Sustainability |
|
The
following is a popular Tu B'Shevat tale, which highlights a Jewish
ethic of stewardship.
Long ago, there lived a man named Honi. One day he saw an old man
planting a carob tree. Honi said to him: "Foolish man, do you think
you will live to eat and enjoy the fruit of the tree you plant today?
It will not bear fruit for many, many years". The old man replied:
"I found trees in the world when I was born. My grandparents planted
them for me. Now I am planting for my grandchildren." (15).
Back
to Top
|
| The
Eleventh Commandment |
|
In
the 1940s, long before the world's scientists began to speak of
global climate change, Walter C. Lowdermilk, Chief of Research of
the Soil Conservation Service, first argued the need for an eleventh
commandment to have been delivered by Moses, one which would read:
"Thou
shall inherit the holy earth as a faithful steward, conserving its
resources and productivity from generation to generation. Thou shalt
safeguard thy fields from soil erosion, thy living waters from drying
up, thy forests from desolation, and protect thy hills from over-grazing
by thy herds, so that thy descendants may have abundance forever.
If any shall fail in this stewardship of the land thy fruitful fields
shall become sterile stony ground and wasting gullies, and thy descendants
shall decrease and live in poverty or be destroyed from off the
face of the earth" (16).
While
there was no such eleventh commandment delivered by Moses, the spirit
of the commandment is found extensively throughout the Hebrew Scriptures
and Jewish literature. The message is oft-repeated that responsible
fulfillment of humankind's commitment to the environment will result
in spiritual fulfillment, while neglect or destruction of the gift
of Creation given to us will lead to human downfall. This message
is an undeniable command for environmental action.
Back
to Top
|
| |
| To
see a full text of the research, click
here. |
| |
|
Bibliography
(1),
(13): Frymer-Kensky,
Tivka. "Ecology in a Biblical Perspective". In Worldviews, Religion
and the Environment: A Global Anthology, edited by Richard C.
Foltz, 290-6. California: Wadsworth-Thomson, 2003.
(2),
(7), (9): Cohen, Jeremy. "On Classical Judaism and Environmental
Crisis." In Judaism and Environmental Ethics, edited by Martin
D. Yaffe, 73-39. New York: Lexington, 2001.
(3),
(4), (5), (6): White,
Lynn Jr. "The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis." Science
155 (1967): 1203-7. JStor (7 June 2006).
(8):
Allen, E.A. "The Hebrew View of Nature." In
Judaism and Environmental Ethics, edited by Martin D. Yaffe,
73-39. New York: Lexington, 2001.
(10),
(12): Hutterman,
Aloys. The Ecological Message of the Torah. Atlanta: Scholars
Press, 1999.
(11),
(14): Helfand,
Jonathan. "Judaism and Environmental Ethics." In Religion and
Environmental Crisis, edited by Eugene C. Hargrove, 38-52. Athens:
University of Georgia Press, 1986.
(15):
Bush, Rabbi John. Tu B'Shevat Seder Booklet.
Temple Anshe Hesed. Received 15 December 2007.
(16):
Lowdermilk, Walter C. "The Eleventh Commandment".
In Worldviews, Religion and the Environment: A Global Anthology,
edited by Richard C. Foltz, 12-16. California: Wadsworth-Thomson,
2003.
|
|